Rear-end collision was not the cause of the Plaintiff’s claimed injuries. Plaintiff claimed significant injuries to his back, neck and headaches following a car accident. Mohammed Nofal argued that the low-impact collision was not the proximate cause of the injury, and also disputed the nature and extent of the injuries. The jury agreed – and…

Mohammed Nofal successfully tried a motor vehicle collision resulting in a favorable defense verdict. Plaintiff claimed significant injuries as a result of the crash. Mohammed disputed that Plaintiff was injured to the extent she claimed. After an effective cross-examination of the Plaintiff’s medical physician, the jury disagreed with Plaintiff’s claim and returned a defense verdict…

Plaintiff transported his ATVs to defendant’s garage for repairs. They were stored in a locked, secure and well-lite area. Overnight, the garage was vandalized and the ATVs stolen. Plaintiff filed suit against the garage owner. After a bench trial, the Judge agreed with Mohammed Nofal’s position that the theft did not occur as a result…

Mohammed A. Nofal successfully tried and defended an electrical contractor in a construction negligence case pending in WillCounty. After seven days of testimony, and at the close of the trial, the Plaintiff requested an award in excess of $4 million. After deliberating for less than an hour, the jury returned a verdict in favor of…