<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MOHAMMED A. NOFAL Archives - Langhenry, Gillen, Lundquist &amp; Johnson, LLC</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.lglfirm.com/category/trials/mohammed-a-nofal-trials/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.lglfirm.com/category/trials/mohammed-a-nofal-trials/</link>
	<description>Illinois Law Firm</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2023 18:00:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.10</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Jury finds in favor of General Contractor</title>
		<link>https://www.lglfirm.com/attorney-achievements/jury-finds-favor-general-contractor/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rachel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 11:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney Achievements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MOHAMMED A. NOFAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TROY A. LUNDQUIST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lglfirm.com/?p=2348</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Troy A. Lundquist and Mohammed A. Nofal successfully tried and defended a general contractor in a construction negligence case pending in Will County, IL. After fourteen days of testimony and evidence, at the close of the trial the Plaintiff requested an award in excess of $9 million. The jury returned a verdict in favor of...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.lglfirm.com/attorney-achievements/jury-finds-favor-general-contractor/">Jury finds in favor of General Contractor</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.lglfirm.com">Langhenry, Gillen, Lundquist &amp; Johnson, LLC</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jury agrees that low-impact collision was not proximate cause of injury</title>
		<link>https://www.lglfirm.com/attorney-achievements/jury-agrees-low-impact-collision-proximate-cause-injury/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rachel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 01:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney Achievements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MOHAMMED A. NOFAL]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lglfirm.com/?p=1365</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Rear-end collision was not the cause of the Plaintiff’s claimed injuries. Plaintiff claimed significant injuries to his back, neck and headaches following a car accident. Mohammed Nofal argued that the low-impact collision was not the proximate cause of the injury, and also disputed the nature and extent of the injuries. The jury agreed – and...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.lglfirm.com/attorney-achievements/jury-agrees-low-impact-collision-proximate-cause-injury/">Jury agrees that low-impact collision was not proximate cause of injury</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.lglfirm.com">Langhenry, Gillen, Lundquist &amp; Johnson, LLC</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jury disagrees with Plaintiff’s injury claim</title>
		<link>https://www.lglfirm.com/attorney-achievements/jury-disagrees-plaintiffs-injury-claim/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rachel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 01:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney Achievements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MOHAMMED A. NOFAL]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lglfirm.com/?p=1361</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Mohammed Nofal successfully tried a motor vehicle collision resulting in a favorable defense verdict. Plaintiff claimed significant injuries as a result of the crash. Mohammed disputed that Plaintiff was injured to the extent she claimed. After an effective cross-examination of the Plaintiff’s medical physician, the jury disagreed with Plaintiff’s claim and returned a defense verdict...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.lglfirm.com/attorney-achievements/jury-disagrees-plaintiffs-injury-claim/">Jury disagrees with Plaintiff’s injury claim</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.lglfirm.com">Langhenry, Gillen, Lundquist &amp; Johnson, LLC</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Repair Garage not liable for theft of customer’s ATVs</title>
		<link>https://www.lglfirm.com/attorney-achievements/repair-garage-liable-theft-customers-atvs/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rachel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 01:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney Achievements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MOHAMMED A. NOFAL]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lglfirm.com/?p=1368</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Plaintiff transported his ATVs to defendant’s garage for repairs. They were stored in a locked, secure and well-lite area. Overnight, the garage was vandalized and the ATVs stolen. Plaintiff filed suit against the garage owner. After a bench trial, the Judge agreed with Mohammed Nofal’s position that the theft did not occur as a result...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.lglfirm.com/attorney-achievements/repair-garage-liable-theft-customers-atvs/">Repair Garage not liable for theft of customer’s ATVs</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.lglfirm.com">Langhenry, Gillen, Lundquist &amp; Johnson, LLC</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jury Returns verdict in favor of Electrical Contractor</title>
		<link>https://www.lglfirm.com/attorney-achievements/jury-returns-verdict-in-favor-of-electrical-contractor/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rachel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney Achievements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MOHAMMED A. NOFAL]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lglfirm.com/?p=647</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Mohammed A. Nofal successfully tried and defended an electrical contractor in a construction negligence case pending in WillCounty. After seven days of testimony, and at the close of the trial, the Plaintiff requested an award in excess of $4 million. After deliberating for less than an hour, the jury returned a verdict in favor of...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.lglfirm.com/attorney-achievements/jury-returns-verdict-in-favor-of-electrical-contractor/">Jury Returns verdict in favor of Electrical Contractor</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.lglfirm.com">Langhenry, Gillen, Lundquist &amp; Johnson, LLC</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
