- Appellate Practice
- Business Practices
- Catastrophic Loss Recovery and Defense
- Commercial and Complex Litigation
- Commercial Real Estate and Land Development
- Construction Law
- Employment Practices And Workers’ Compensation Defense/Recovery
- Insurance Coverage
- Insurance Defense Litigation
- Medical Malpractice
- Municipal and Public Official Liability
- Nonprofit Organizations
- Nursing Home and Senior Housing
- Products Liability Defense
- Jury Returns Verdict in favor of Hospital and Emergency Medicine Physicians
- Judge Grants Summary Judgment in favor of Hospital and Emergency Medicine Physician
- Jury Returns Verdict in favor of Health System and Family Practice Physician
- Victory on Claims of Excessive Force Against Task Force Members
- Radiologist not guilty of failing to diagnose lung cancer in a 40-year-old male which resulted in his death and, who was survived by a wife and 4 children
Although we strive for accuracy, the content of our blog is intended for informational purposes only. It is not intended to solicit business or to provide legal advice. Laws differ by jurisdiction, and the information may not apply to every reader. You should not take, or refrain from taking, any legal action based upon the information contained on this blog without first seeking professional counsel.
Your use of the blog does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and LGLJ.
Tag Archives: liability for undisclosed property defects
Illinois real estate agents and brokers perform extensive due diligence in completing a transaction, from a simple home inspection on a residential sale to environmental site assessments in commercial transactions. Nonetheless, there are many things that an agent or broker simply cannot know about a property. Recently, several cases have again addressed the extent of a real estate salesperson or broker’s liability for undisclosed, hidden or latent conditions in a property, including those conditions known only by the seller of the property. While there are a number of different statutory and common law causes of action, each with their own unique requirements to prevail on a claim, the same fundamental questions permeate all of them:
Did the salesperson or broker know that the statement was false when it was made or withhold some relevant information about the condition?
Even if the salesperson or broker did not know a statement was false or that omitted information was relevant, should they have? In other words, did the agent or broker negligently make the statement or withhold information?
Did the buyer suffer any damages as a direct result of the false statement or omission?
The field of potential undisclosed, latent or hidden conditions is wide, and Illinois courts have addressed claims against real estate professionals based on such varied issues as title defects, architectural or design flaws, termite damage, flooding history, commercial revenue statements, local ordinances and school district lines. Just as the conditions vary, so do the defenses, but here are a few points to keep in mind for your business:
When in doubt, disclose any condition of the property to the buyer prior to any transaction.
The Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (the “Consumer Fraud Act”) allows for statutory fraud actions against both a buyer’s or seller’s real estate salesperson or broker if “the salesman or broker knows of the false, misleading or deceptive character of such information.” The Consumer Fraud Act is a popular mechanism for plaintiffs’ attorneys because if a violation is proven, it allows for statutory recovery of the attorney’s fees.
The Illinois Real Estate License Act of 2000 also allows a private right of action for purchasers of property against their own real estate broker and the seller’s broker. The Real Estate License Act provides: Read More…