- Appellate Practice
- Business Practices
- Catastrophic Loss Recovery and Defense
- Commercial and Complex Litigation
- Commercial Real Estate and Land Development
- Construction Law
- Employment Practices And Workers’ Compensation Defense/Recovery
- Insurance Coverage
- Insurance Defense Litigation
- Medical Malpractice
- Municipal and Public Official Liability
- Nonprofit Organizations
- Nursing Home and Senior Housing
- Products Liability Defense
Tag Archives: Illinois Human Rights Employment Discrimination
The Illinois Human Rights Act has been on the books for years, yet some of its provisions may come as a surprise to Illinois employers. It should go without saying that few employers would intend to violate Illinois’ laws protecting an employee’s civil rights, but what about conduct which an employer may not even realize is a violation of the Act? Here are five prohibitions from the Act that may surprise you.
An employer is prohibited from restricting its employees from communicating by a certain language
The Act gives specific examples of what it means by “language.” Language means a person’s native tongue, such as Polish, Spanish or Chinese. Language does not include such things as slang, jargon, profanity or vulgarity. It is a civil rights violation under the Illinois Human Rights Act for an employer to impose a restriction which has the effect of prohibiting its employees from speaking a particular language.
An employer is prohibited from inquiring into or using the fact of an arrest or an expunged criminal history as a basis for most employment decisions
It is a civil rights violation under the Act for any employer, “to inquire into or to use the fact of an arrest or criminal history record information ordered expunged, sealed or impounded . . . as a basis to refuse to hire, to segregate, or to act with respect to recruitment, hiring, promotion, renewal of employment, selection for training or apprenticeship, discharge, discipline, tenure or terms, privileges or conditions of employment.” In other words, an employer cannot consider even an expunged record as a basis for taking the above described employment actions. Importantly, exceptions do exist. The employer may use “other information” indicating that the person actually engaged in the conduct for which he was arrested, but may not use the mere fact of the arrest or criminal history ordered expunged, sealed or impounded. The Act explicitly states that this provision does not prohibit compliance with state or federal laws or regulations that require criminal background checks in evaluating the qualifications and character of an employee or a prospective employee.
An employer can be liable for sexual harassment in certain circumstances even when the employer was not the one who committed the harassment
An employer will be liable vicariously for the sexual harassment performed by its managerial or supervisory employees. In the case of non-managerial or non-supervisory employees, however, the employer would only be liable if he is aware of it and fails to take reasonable corrective measures. So, for managerial or supervisory employees, the employer can be liable under the Act for the sexual harassment, regardless of whether it was aware of the harassment and regardless of whether it took measurements to correct it.
It is a civil rights violation for an employer to take employment action on the basis of “unlawful discrimination,” including sexual orientation
What does unlawful discrimination mean? The Act defines the phrase. Unlawful discrimination is defined by the act to mean discrimination against the person because of race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, age, sex and marital status, order of protection status, disability, military status, sexual orientation, or unfavorable discharge from military service.” The Act goes on to define that sexual orientation refers to one’s actual or perceived sexuality.
An employer cannot discriminate based on unfavorable military discharge, except in the case of dishonorable discharge
The phrase “unlawful discrimination” is also defined so as to include an unfavorable military discharge. This includes discharges from the armed forces of the United States, their reserves, or the national guard or naval militias. Significantly, the Act excludes a discharge characterized as “dishonorable.” With the exception of a dishonorable discharge, it is a civil rights violation for the employer to take an employment action as defined by the statute, with respect to an unfavorable military discharge.
These five aspects of the Illinois Human Rights Act may be just the tip of the iceberg of the laws and regulations with which Illinois employers must comply. By educating themselves on some of their legal obligations, employers may be better able to protect themselves from unknowingly walking into a civil rights violation under the Illinois Human Rights Act.